天天网官方

  • ParAccel

    Analysis of columnar data warehouse DBMS vendor ParAccel, maker of PADB (ParAccel Analytic DataBase). Related subjects include:

    August 28, 2016

    Are analytic RDBMS and data warehouse appliances obsolete?

    I used to spend most of my time — blogging and consulting alike — on data warehouse appliances and analytic DBMS. Now I’m barely involved with them. The most obvious reason is that there have been drastic changes in industry structure:

    Simply reciting all that, however, begs the question of whether one should still care about analytic RDBMS at all.

    My answer, in a nutshell, is:

    Analytic RDBMS — whether on premises in software, in the form of data warehouse appliances, or in the cloud — are still great for hard-core business intelligence, where “hard-core” can refer to ad-hoc query complexity, reporting/dashboard concurrency, or both. But they aren’t good for much else.

    Read more

    August 7, 2014

    Actian Vector Hadoop Edition

    I have a small blacklist of companies I won’t talk with because of their particularly unethical past behavior. Actian is one such; they evidently made stuff up about me that Josh Berkus gullibly posted for them, and I don’t want to have conversations that could be dishonestly used against me.

    That said, Peter Boncz isn’t exactly an Actian employee. Rather, he’s the professor who supervised Marcin Zukowski’s PhD thesis that became Vectorwise, and I chatted with Peter by Skype while he was at home in Amsterdam. I believe his assurances that no Actian personnel sat in on the call. ??

    In other news, Peter is currently working on and optimistic about HyPer. But we literally spent less than a minute talking about that

    Before I get to the substance, there’s been a lot of renaming at Actian. To quote Andrew Brust,

    … the ParAccel, Pervasive and?Vectorwise technologies are being unified under the Actian Analytics Platform brand.?Specifically, the ParAccel?technology … is being?re-branded?Actian Matrix; Pervasive’s?technologies are rechristened Actian DataFlow and Actian DataConnect; and Vectorwise becomes Actian Vector.

    and

    Actian … is now “one company, with one voice and one platform” according to its John Santaferraro

    The bolded part of the latter quote is untrue — at least in the ordinary sense of the word “one” — but the rest can presumably be taken as company gospel.

    All this is by way of preamble to saying that Peter reached out to me about Actian’s new Vector Hadoop Edition when he blogged about it last June, and we finally talked this week. Highlights include:? Read more

    August 12, 2013

    Things I keep needing to say

    Some subjects just keep coming up. And so I keep saying things like:

    Most generalizations about “Big Data” are false. “Big Data” is a horrific catch-all term, with many different meanings.

    Most generalizations about Hadoop are false. Reasons include:

    Hadoop won’t soon replace relational data warehouses, if indeed it ever does. SQL-on-Hadoop is still very immature. And you can’t replace data warehouses unless you have the power of SQL.

    Note: SQL isn’t the only way to provide “the power of SQL”, but alternative approaches are just as immature.

    Most generalizations about NoSQL are false. Different NoSQL products are … different. It’s not even accurate to say that all NoSQL systems lack SQL interfaces. (For example, SQL-on-Hadoop often includes SQL-on-HBase.)

    Read more

    April 29, 2013

    More on Actian/ParAccel/VectorWise/Versant/etc.

    My quick reaction to the Actian/ParAccel deal was negative. A few challenges to my views then emerged. They didn’t really change my mind.

    Amazon Redshift

    Amazon did a deal with ParAccel that amounted to:

    Some argue that this is great for ParAccel’s future prospects. I’m not convinced.

    No doubt there are and will be Redshift users, evidently including Infor. But so far as I can tell, Redshift uses very standard SQL, so it doesn’t seed a ParAccel market in terms of developer habits. The administration/operation story is similar. So outside of general validation/bragging rights, Redshift is not a big deal for ParAccel.

    OEMs and bragging rights

    It’s not just Amazon and Infor; there’s also a MicroStrategy deal to OEM ParAccel — I think it’s the real ParAccel software in that case — for a particular service, MicroStrategy Wisdom. But unless I’m terribly mistaken, HP Vertica, Sybase IQ and even Infobright each have a lot more OEMs than ParAccel, just as they have a lot more customers than ParAccel overall.

    This OEM success is a great validation for the idea of columnar analytic RDBMS in general, but I don’t see where it’s an advantage for ParAccel vs. the columnar leaders. Read more

    April 25, 2013

    Goodbye VectorWise, farewell ParAccel?

    Actian, which already owns VectorWise, is also buying ParAccel. The argument for why this kills VectorWise is simple. ParAccel does most things VectorWise does, more or less as well. It also does a lot more:

    One might conjecture that ParAccel is bad at highly concurrent, single-node use cases, and VectorWise is better at them — but at the link above, ParAccel bragged of supporting 5,000 concurrent connections. Besides, if one is just looking for a high-use reporting server, why not get Sybase IQ?? Anyhow, Actian hasn’t been investing enough in VectorWise to make it a major market player, and they’re unlikely to start now that they own ParAccel as well.

    But I expect ParAccel to fail too. Reasons include:

    Read more

    February 5, 2013

    Comments on Gartner’s 2012 Magic Quadrant for Data Warehouse Database Management Systems — evaluations

    To my taste, the most glaring mis-rankings in the 2012/2013 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Data Warehouse Database Management are that it is too positive on Kognitio and too negative on Infobright. Secondarily, it is too negative on HP Vertica, and too positive on ParAccel and Actian/VectorWise. So let’s consider those vendors first.

    Gartner seems confused about Kognitio’s products and history alike.

    Gartner is correct, however, to note that Kognitio doesn’t sell much stuff overall.

    * non-existent

    In the cases of HP Vertica, Infobright, ParAccel, and Actian/VectorWise, the 2012 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Data Warehouse Database Management’s facts are fairly accurate, but I dispute Gartner’s evaluation. When it comes to Vertica: Read more

    December 9, 2012

    Amazon Redshift and its implications

    Merv Adrian and Doug Henschen both reported more details about Amazon Redshift than I intend to; see also the comments on Doug’s article. I did talk with Rick Glick of ParAccel a bit about the project, and he noted:

    “We didn’t want to do the deal on those terms” comments from other companies suggest ParAccel’s main financial take from the deal is an already-reported venture investment.

    The cloud-related engineering was mainly around communications, e.g. strengthening error detection/correction to make up for the lack of dedicated switches. In general, Rick seemed more positive on running in the (Amazon) cloud than analytic RDBMS vendors have been in the past.

    So who should and will use Amazon Redshift? For starters, I’d say: Read more

    December 9, 2012

    ParAccel update

    In connection with Amazon’s Redshift announcement, ParAccel reached out, and so I talked with them for the first time in a long while. At the highest level:

    There wasn’t time for a lot of technical detail, but I gather that the bit about working alongside other data stores:

    Also, it seems that ParAccel:

    Read more

    August 7, 2012

    Notes on some basic database terminology

    In a call Monday with a prominent company, I was told:

    That, to put it mildly, is not accurate. So I shall try, yet again, to set the record straight.

    In an industry where people often call a DBMS just a “database” — so that a database is something that manages a database! — one may wonder why I bother. Anyhow …

    1. The products commonly known as Oracle, Exadata, DB2, Sybase, SQL Server, Teradata, Sybase IQ, Netezza, Vertica, Greenplum, Aster, Infobright, SAND, ParAccel, Exasol, Kognitio et al. all either are or incorporate relational database management systems, aka RDBMS or relational DBMS.

    2. In principle, there can be difficulties in judging whether or not a DBMS is “relational”. In practice, those difficulties don’t arise — yet. Every significant DBMS still falls into one of two categories:

    *I expect the distinction to get more confusing soon, at which point I’ll adopt terms more precise than “relational things” and “relational stuff”.

    3. There are two chief kinds of relational DBMS: Read more

    May 22, 2012

    Kognitio’s story today

    I had dinner tonight with the Kognitio folks. So far as I can tell:

    Kognitio believes that this story is appealing, especially to smaller venture-capital-backed companies, and backs that up with some frieNDA pipeline figures.

    Between that success claim and SAP’s HANA figures, it seems that the idea of using an in-memory DBMS to accelerate analytics has legs. This makes sense, as the BI vendors — Qlik Tech excepted — don’t seem to be accomplishing much with their proprietary in-memory alternatives. But I’m not sure that Kognitio would be my first choice to fill that role. Rather, if I wanted to buy an unsuccessful analytic RDBMS to use as an in-memory accelerator, I might consider ParAccel, which is columnar, has an associated compression story, has always had a hybrid memory-centric flavor much as Kognitio has, and is well ahead of Kognitio in the analytic platform derby. That said, I’ll confess to not having talked with or heard much about ParAccel for a while, so I don’t know if they’ve been able maintain technical momentum any more than Kognitio has.

    Next Page →

    Feed: DBMS (database management system), DW (data warehousing), BI (business intelligence), and analytics technology Subscribe to the Monash Research feed via RSS or email:

    Login

    Search our blogs and white papers

    Monash Research blogs

    User consulting

    Building a short list? Refining your strategic plan? We can help.

    Vendor advisory

    We tell vendors what's happening -- and, more important, what they should do about it.

    Monash Research highlights

    Learn about white papers, webcasts, and blog highlights, by RSS or email.

  • yzc88亚洲城

    环求网

    中国福彩网app正规

    五福彩票app下载送十五

    www.凯发

    彩01彩票注册-首页

    福彩世界app下载

    万丰维加斯国际

    探比分球